Posts tagged technology

Top 100 Tools for Learning 2010

1

If you haven’t seen this list yet, it’s worth checking out. Below is a slideshow with the top educational tools, ranked by the Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies. They compile this list every year.

Educational Technology and Learning

A presentation about the relationship between educational technology and learning.

The Case for Ed Tech

0

“I can’t believe you let students access the Internet without even talking to us parents about it. I don’t see why they need to be online. We didn’t have these things when we were in school and we got a good education. Kids are just wasting their time online on websites like Myspace and schools are doing nothing about it. How about you use the taxpayer money you waste on expensive computers to fix up the schools or pay the teachers more?”

This is just one of many messages that I’ve received from parents who are upset about the fact that our schools use technology. With a career in educational technology and having tinkered with computers since the age of seven, I sometimes find these statements foreign and quite confusing. It’s not uncommon to find parents who think schools are wasting their time buying new computers, and many of them have never even heard of an interactive whiteboard or a document camera. However, it’s a perfectly valid concern. They have good intentions. They believe education should come first, but it may not be readily apparent just how technology improves the quality of education. If we as educators are making decisions to adopt additional technology, the justification for its use rests on our shoulders. Fortunately, there is a wide body of evidence that demonstrates the powerful and beneficial impact technology can have on an educational environment.
What is Educational Technology?
So there’s no ambiguity, let’s define exactly what is meant by “educational technology.” According to the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), it is “the study and ethical practice of facilitating learning and improving performance by creating, using, and managing appropriate technological processes and resources” (Januszewski & Molenda, 2008, p. 2). What this means in a nutshell is that educational technology exists specifically to help students become better learners. If it does not help them in this capacity, it is not an appropriate technology.
Insisting we shouldn’t be using technology in a school is like saying we shouldn’t be driving cars because we have perfectly good horses. There are things a car can do that a horse can’t, such as travel 80 miles per hour and get people to their destinations faster. On the other hand, a horse can travel on rugged terrain most cars can’t reach.
Perhaps it’s ironic that the parent who sent the complaint did so through email. Why was email used instead of the traditional postal service? Because modern technology advances allow near-instantaneous communication across the world, and since my email address was readily available to this parent, it was the obvious choice. It was the best tool for the job, just like depending on the situation, a car or horse may be the best means of transportation.
A proper study of educational technology identifies the best tools that will create optimal learning experiences for students, or benefit teachers in some way that helps them communicate their instruction more efficiently and effectively. One important fact should be kept in mind: Technology is not a replacement for a teacher. There is no time in the foreseeable future when a teacher’s job will be made obsolete. Instead, when placed in the hands of a good teacher, technology can improve teaching skills and cultivate an improvement in students’ learning.
Technology Transforms the K-12 School System
Most of our students are already immersed in a technological world. They’re skilled users who have grown up with technology in their daily lives. They’re users of cell phones, iPods, video games, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and many other technology tools. Prensky (2001) refers to these children as “digital natives,” young people who are adept users of technology and have always been surrounded by it. They are familiar and competent with the digital tools, and embrace new technologies as they appear. Contrasted with “digital natives” are the “digital immigrants,” the older generation who recall a time when modern technology tools did not exist, and who often have an awkward time adopting them. Students today have different expectations of technological engagement than students used to, and they may expect the same level of engagement in their schools.
Fortunately, there is a wide spectrum of technology tools that can benefit learning in a K-12 environment. For example, teachers can use podcasting to improve their students’ reading, literacy, and language skills, and use auditory playback to identify where they need additional instructional assistance. Podcasting can also be used to share lectures that students may have missed (Hew, 2009). Document cameras and digital projectors allow teachers to display papers, photographs, books, and lab specimens on a big screen (Doe, 2008). Google Earth allows students to instantly explore the world, locate famous landmarks, and watch embedded instructional videos. Blogs allow both students and parents to instantly communicate with the teachers, and provide a window into the classroom. When used by students, they can increase literacy skills and promote global citizenship (Witte, 2007). Augmented reality devices project images over real-life objects, creating visual, highly-engaging activities (Dunleavy, Dede, & Mitchell, 2007). Even the video games students like to play online have educational promise because “they immerse students in complex communities of practice” and “invite extended engagement with course material” (Delwiche, 2006). Our youngest learners can benefit from technology, too, as one study showed that preschoolers who were introduced to video and educational games experienced marked improvement in literacy and conceptualizing skills over students who did not have access to these technology tools (Penuel, Pasnik, Bates, Townsend, Gallagher, Llorente, & Hupert, 2009).
Students with disabilities also benefit from using technology tools. Rhodes & Milby (2007) found that students with disabilities are often proficient with using technology to accomplish learning tasks and interactive activities they wouldn’t otherwise be able to do. Electronic books, with their text-to-speech capabilities, animation, and interactivity can boost their confidence, and encourage fluency, comprehension, and language skills.
Technology is more than just a gimmick. It can improve the cognitive learning abilities of students, and support and enhance their learning capabilities (Krentler & Willis-Flurry, 2007). Even students who generally struggle with learning or have disciplinary problems show improvement when technology is used (Dunleavy, et al., 2007). Technology can stimulate children’s cognitive development by improving logical thinking, classification, and concept visualization skills, and creating intellectually stimulating hands-on learning activities. Skills such as literacy, mathematics, and writing are improved and reinforced by a technology-oriented education (Mouza, 2005). Students who recognize technology’s educational benefits are more likely to become engaged in the learning process, seek out their own learning opportunities, maintain a stronger focus on accomplishing their learning tasks, and improve their higher-order thinking skills that allow them to become better problem-solvers (Hopson, Simms, & Knezek, 2001).
One benefit of the Internet is that students have an easy way to share their hard work with a wide audience. Students gain confidence and pride when they see their products in a visual form. The online social aspect can also reduce feelings of isolation, and encourage discussions and peer instruction (Mouza, 2005). One researcher commented, “Youth could benefit from educators being more open to forms of experimentation and social exploration that are generally not characteristic of educational institutions” (Ito, Horst, Bittanti, Boyd, Herr-Stephenson, & Lange, 2009). So important is technology to a K-12 school environment that the National Association for the Education of Young Children states that technology should be used as an active part of the learning process (Rhodes & Milby, 2007).
Technology Enhances Professional Development
Professional development refers to any skills or knowledge obtained that benefits one in their career. We are experiencing an unusual phenomenon in our school systems. For once, most of our students possess a greater knowledge and skill in a field than many teachers do. It’s important that teachers engage in professional development opportunities so they can “keep up” with the students’ extensive experience with technology.
Not long ago, the extent of a teacher’s learning didn’t stretch beyond the walls of the school. Teachers would gather in the teachers’ lounge to discuss their instructional strategies. One way to motivate teachers and provide ongoing work-related educational support is through online communities, where peers support each others’ learning. Hausman and Goldring (2001) found that teachers are most committed to their schools when they have a sense of community, and are offered opportunities to learn.
In an online community, a teacher can post a question and receive back insightful answers with minimal effort on their part. Teachers can also share their experiences, and gather evidence of the success of new techniques (Duncan-Howell, 2010). Online courses are prevalent, podcasts are available to extend learning, professional-oriented chat rooms spring up, educators share their thoughts on their blogs, and teachers set up and share webcam feeds at conferences so other members of the online community can learn the new techniques and skills necessary for teaching modern students. Technology has allowed teachers to figuratively break through the walls of their schools and engage a vast community of like-minded individuals who come together to interact, learn, and share knowledge with each other.
Technology is Necessary in the Outside World
One of the expectations of our education system is that students will be taught the skills necessary to be productive and competitive members of society and the modern workplace. As Harris (1996) pointed out, “Information Age citizens must learn not only how to access information, but more importantly how to manage, analyze, critique, cross-reference, and transform it into usable knowledge” (p. 15). Businesses are rapidly adopting new technologies to simplify and enhance their processes, and are demanding higher-order critical thinking skills of their job candidates. Adults who use the Internet have greater success at obtaining jobs, and have higher salaries (DiMaggio, Hargittai, Celeste, & Shafer, 2004), and technology prepares students for the modern-day jobs they will obtain by teaching them skills such as motivation, engagement, and online collaboration (Ringstaff & Kelley, 2002). If students are not taught the necessary skills they need during their K-12 education, they will be at a severe disadvantage when they are ready to enter the workforce.
Face-to-face communication skills are and likely always will be important in the workplace, but social business skills have expanded to include more than just face-to-face communication. Teleconferencing, collaborative document authoring, online correspondence, video conferencing, and more are common in modern workplaces. While parents think their children are wasting their time talking to others online, our youth are acquiring basic social and technological skills they need to fully participate in contemporary society (Ito, et al., 2009). If we restrict our children from using these online social forms of learning, we are stifling their future careers, and preventing them from being able to compete in this digital age.
Conclusion
In the parent’s message at the beginning of this paper there was one fundamental misconception: that technology and learning are at odds with each other. This is simply not the case, and the research paints a very different picture. We are experiencing a “shrinking world” as technology has opened lines of communication that just 20 years ago were either impossible or a monumentally expensive feat. Students should realize the educational potential of technology, and we must be prepared to create learning opportunities that encourage them to use technology in their education. Ultimately, if we wish to create motivated, lifelong learners with the necessary knowledge and skills that give them a competitive advantage in modern careers, we must embrace technology in our schools.
References

Delwiche, A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160-172.

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Social inequality, 355–400.

Doe, C. (2008). A look at document cameras. MultiMedia & Internet@Schools, 15(5), 30-33.


Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324-340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x


Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 18(1), 7-22. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1


Harris, J. (1996). Information is forever in formation, knowledge is the knower: Global connectivity in K-12 classrooms.  Computers in the Schools, 72(1-2), 11-22.


Hausman, C. S., & Goldring, E. B. (2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 30-51.


Hew, K. (2009). Use of audio podcast in K-12 and higher education: A review of research topics and methodologies. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(3), 333-357. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9108-3


Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. A. (2001). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109-120.


Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.


Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Lange, P. G. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Retrieved May 4, 2010, from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf.


Krentler, K. A. & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316-321. doi:10.3200/JOEB.80.6.316-321


Mouza, C. (2005). Using technology to enhance early childhood learning: The 100 days of school project. Educational Research & Evaluation, 11(6), 513-528.


Penuel, W. R., Pasnik, S., Bates, L., Townsend, E., Gallagher, L. P., Llorente, C., & Hupert, N. (2009). Preschool teachers can use a media-rich curriculum to prepare low-income children for school success: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Summative evaluation of the “Ready to learn initiative”. Education Development Center. Retrieved May 4, 2010 from http://cct.edc.org/rtl/pdf/RTLEvalReport.pdf.


Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved May 4, 2010, from http://www.hfmboces.org/HFMDistrictServices/TechYES/PrenskyDigitalNatives.pdf


Rhodes, J., & Milby, T. (2007). Teacher-created electronic books: Integrating technology to support readers with disabilities. Reading Teacher, 61(3), 255-259.


Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our education technology investment: A review of findings from  research. San Francisco: WestEd. Retrieved May 4, 2010, from https://www.msu.edu/~corleywi/documents/Positive_impact_tech/The%20learning%20return%20on%20our%20educational%20technology%20investment.pdf


Witte, S. (2007). “That’s online writing, not boring school writing”: Writing with blogs and the talkback project. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 92-96.

Some Articles About Technology in Education

0

Jackson, A., Gaudet, L., McDaniel, L., & Brammer, D. (2009). Curriculum Integration: The use of technology to support learning. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 6(7), 71-78.

This article addresses the benefits of technology in education from the perspective of Howard Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences, which states that there are different realms of learning, and that different learning styles may be better suited to different people. A person with logical-mathematical intelligence could benefit from engaging interactive multimedia technology that offers immediate feedback. Technology can offer simulated challenges that encourage higher-level thinking.

Mouza, C. (2005). Using technology to enhance early childhood learning: The 100 days of school project. Educational Research & Evaluation, 11(6), 513-528.

Some claims have been made that technology can disrupt or stifle learning processes, and this article addresses these concerns. Mouza, an Associate Professor in the School of Education at the University of Delaware, explores six teachers in an elementary school and how they integrated technology into their curriculum. The study demonstrates that technology can support child cognitive development by improving logical thinking, classification, concept visualization, and creating intellectually stimulating hands-on learning activities ideal for young children. Skills such as literacy, mathematics, and writing show improvement, and are reinforced by technology-oriented education. Students gain confidence and pride when they see their products in a visual technological form, and proper usage of technology can reduce social isolation, and encourage discussions and peer instruction.

Rhodes, J., & Milby, T. (2007). Teacher-created electronic books: Integrating technology to support readers with disabilities. Reading Teacher, 61(3), 255-259.

This article demonstrates that students with disabilities often are proficient with using technology to accomplish learning tasks and interactive activities they wouldn’t otherwise be able to do. The National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) states that technology should be used as an active part of the learning process. Electronic books, with their text-to-speech capabilities, animation, and interactivity can boost the confidence of students with disabilities, and encourage their fluency, comprehension, and language skills.

Squire, K., Barnett, M., & Grant, J. (2004). Electromagnetism supercharged! Learning physics with digital simulation games. Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Los Angeles, CA.

This conference proceeding contains an analysis of how games can improve learning. Some statistics are included in here that are quite valuable, including a study conducted by researcher Kurt Squire in pre- and post-tests control groups. He found that participants receiving a series of interactive lectures improved their understanding by 15 percent over their pre-test scores, compared with participants who used a specially-developed game/simulation called Supercharged, developed by MIT researchers, who improved their understanding by 28 percent.

Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). “The visual helps me understand the complicated things”: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.

This article examines the views of students, age 10 and 11, regarding interactive whiteboards (IWBs), and how it benefits the teaching and learning processes. (While I don’t think a students’ preference for instruction does not necessarily correlate with the effectiveness of instruction, a student’s preference can still indicate a stronger degree of engagement and participation in the learning process.) The majority of students in the study approved of IWBs as they felt it increased their attention and concentration. Most students liked how concepts can be presented in a concrete form through an IWB, and some claimed that it improved knowledge retention. Negative comments were limited to concerns about technical difficulties.

Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Technology and achievement: The bottom line. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 29-32.

Wenglisky examines the claim that technology usage in schools raises student achievement. The author insists that we are at the point now that teachers should just take for granted that students will use technology to complete their learning tasks. In the 2001 National Assessment of Educational Progress assessment, middle school and high school history students benefited when technology was incorporated into their learning.

Breaking Out of the Shell

0

I received an email from one of our teachers a few days ago, expressing concerns over someone outside our district who linked to her blog. This isn’t the first time I’ve received an email like this, so with her permission, I’m posting her email here, followed by my long-winded reply with more information than she probably wanted to know. I hope this provides some clarity to our teachers who may have similar concerns:

Hi – I had something interesting happen on my blog today.  I received an e-mail to moderate.  The post left was from a student in Alabama that had come across my blog while doing some research for her class.  It had me a bit concerned because I thought I had blocked my blog from this?  Should I be concerned?  She gave me a link to her blog and on her blog she had posted a link back to mine.  I am not sure how I feel about that?  What should I do?  Thanks.

Whether this is good or bad really depends on your point of view. Here’s my two cents. Note that what I say here is just my opinion, and doesn’t represent any official district view, but I hope it provides some perspective.
Keep in mind that the blogs are public, not private. They’ve always been accessible to everyone on the web, and there’s nothing you can really “block” your blog from. Maybe you don’t post links to your blog on all sorts of web sites, but you still don’t have full control over how much it’s publicized. You can password-protect your posts if you want to, but I think that would be missing the point of the blog’s purpose: connectedness and communication. Google indexes your blog so anyone can search it, and we list the latest posts and blog rankings on our district site. We actually do this so people CAN be made more aware of your blog. It’s open to everyone, and it’s a fantastic way to communicate with your students and their parents, and let them communicate with you in turn by leaving comments. Sometimes parents may share your blog with their family and friends, and they in turn may share it with others.
But the blogs can do more than connect you with just your own students and parents. They can also break down the walls of the classroom and connect you to an online learning community, as this student from Alabama demonstrated. I don’t know exactly what this student put in her comment, but she apparently found something very useful on your blog, and liked it enough to not just leave a comment, but link to your blog from her own. That’s a compliment to you. This student’s link will drive more visitors to your blog, and your ranking on the “Visitors per Day” stat will go up.
And if you want to take it further, by following the links your commenters leave, you may find yourself drawn to more sites such as other class blogs, Ning networks, Facebook groups, wikis, Twitter, or wherever educators are gathering on the web. In fact, this is what I’ve found most enjoyable with my own blog, that I can connect with a wide range of people. Most of my visitors aren’t even from within the district; they’re teachers, technology specialists, and school administrators from all over the world. I’ve even been able to meet a few of them face-to-face after connecting with them online. My blog can be a catalyst for stimulating wider conversations and growing my own personal learning network of educators.
There are also teachers out there who are engaged in activities like the Flat Classroom Project – they use wikis and learning networks to synchronize two or more classrooms, and let students from all across the world work with each other on projects. I’ve seen Kindergarten class blogs that have a YackPack button, which lets students and teachers from other classes just click and start talking with the classroom. And here’s some elementary students using Skype to video conference with other students several states away, and doing a collaborative writing project with them in Google Docs, while the teachers and administrators are standing by in amazement. It IS very cool, because it shows you’re not confined to the walls of your classroom anymore.
So my opinion is that this student linking to your blog is a GOOD thing, because it’s just one step to opening you to a larger learning community. And if all this leaves you feeling paranoid, don’t let it! Other teachers are going through many of the same experiences you are, regardless of where they come from, and you can connect with them as well. We want you to have fun with your blog. Be creative with it, and share your classroom experiences, fun activities you do with your students, and more. If other teachers and students outside your class are visiting your blog, that’s just an added bonus.
I also recommend you activate the WP-Slimstat plugin (go to your blog Dashboard, click “Plugins” and then “Activate” next to WP-Slimstat). This will start to gather more detailed statistics on exactly how many people are visiting your blog, what search strings are being used to find your blog, your most popular posts and pages, and so on. If you want some assistance accessing and analyzing all these statistics, let me know.
I hope this helps add a little insight on the wide scope of the blogs. There’s a giant online world out there of online networking and collaboration. Our students are using it already. Perhaps it’s time we start using it, too.
Thanks for the question.

My Vision Nine Months Ago

0

I was looking through some old files from last year, and found a document I’d written about my attendance at the WebBuilder 2.0 Conference in December 2007. I wasn’t blogging back then, and this was originally intended to be an email to my boss with some ideas on the future development of our web portal. I didn’t even finish writing and refining everything I was going to, and it’s a good thing, because it quickly turned from a thoughtful summary into a lengthy rambling discourse. I ended up making a simple PowerPoint to share with him instead.
The conference was actually a good kick in the pants for me, since I wasn’t as aware of the Web 2.0 world as I should have been, and what a powerful tool it was becoming. It exposed me to the importance of collaborative environments, the current trends with the web, and really shifted my mind toward embracing Web 2.0 technologies. I thought the term “Web 2.0” was kind of stupid (actually, I still do) but I can acknowledge that it represents an important shift in how we perceive interaction and collaboration. I wouldn’t attend the conference again, because I pretty much got what I needed out of it, and from the agenda it looks like the sessions haven’t changed much, but I’m grateful for the opportunity I had.
I don’t even agree with everything I wrote in the following document anymore. My knowledge has certainly grown since then. It looks like I didn’t understand OpenSocial, and I’m not entirely sure where I was going with the document storage idea. I also didn’t have a decent approach to social/learning networks — this is still an issue which is going to be difficult to tackle in our district. We had just launched our blogging system using WordPress MU, and were gearing up for deployments of our Moodle system and WeberTube. I’m anxious to see how widely these two services are used now that we’ve launched them.
I do, however, still think that our portal should take a cue from customizable widget-based sites like iGoogle, Netvibes, or Pageflakes. We are creating a new MyWeber portal from the ground up, though we’ve altered our course a little and are now going with a non-Java route. One thing I don’t like about many SISs is that you can’t even see a demo of it unless you have an account set up. How is this any sort of incentive to sign up for the system, if you can’t see an idea of what it’s about? This is why I would like to have both a public face and a private face to the next MyWeber. The public face anyone could visit and create a temporary customizable view and watch WeberTube videos, read district and school news from an RSS widget, look up a specific teacher’s public course assignments, look up Google Maps-based boundary maps for their school, and anything not containing sensitive information. The private face would let appropriate users see student grades, lunch account balances, transcripts — basic stuff for an SIS — but also let them view and write blog posts or leave comments on posts, make or take Moodle quizzes, upload videos, create podcasts, make a calendar, cast votes in a class poll, or anything else we make available.
THE FOLLOWING IDEAS WERE DATED DECEMBER 11, 2007
The [WebBuilder 2.0] conference was immensely useful. There was a tremendous amount of information geared toward developers, designers, and supervisors seeking to bring their web presence into the Web 2.0 world. I wish they hadn’t scheduled so many simultaneous seminars, as I would have liked to attend more of them, but I have uploaded all the conference slides to http://www.justinreeve.com/webbuilder/agenda.html.
Following is a selective summary of my notes, with some ideas on how to best direct our future portal development.
Web 2.0 is a model for a collaborative, user-friendly, socially networked web. Ajax has largely made this possible. Any evolution that takes place in web-based applications in the coming years will be derived from the Ajax framework, services-oriented architecture, and Web 2.0 philosophy. In other words, what has been dubbed “Web 2.0” is not just a fad. It will continue to shape what the future of the web will look like.
Web users now want to be able to do more than just find information. They want to participate and help shape the web. They’ve come to expect that web sites should provide collaborative and social networking opportunities, simple interfaces which mimic desktop applications, and mashups to enhance their experience.
DASHBOARD
I’m convinced the proper setup for the next major version of MyWeber will be the customizable dashboard view, which integrates all our applications into one place. The integration would include simplified Java-based translations of the PHP applications we have in place. While the same PHP backends for WordPress, Moodle, etc. would remain, the portal will provide a simple framework to accomplish basic tasks, such as:

  • Viewing assignments for a class.
  • Adding a new blog entry.
  • Uploading a video to WeberTube.
  • Taking a Moodle quiz.

In addition, widgets would be available for all the other functions we have and then some, e.g. user searching, progress reporting, podcasting, video streaming, taking surveys, etc.
MASHUPS
We’re already adopting most of the technologies that are needed to stay up to date on the current trends, and to enable our users to have the kind of interactive experience they expect. We need to decide what goals we want to accomplish, and what applications will help us reach them. Being able to integrate the different applications together is key.
Mashups are web applications that help integrate different sites together, combining data from other sources into a single, integrated tool. For example:

  • A single “Videos” widget in the portal could grab relevant videos uploaded to Moodle, WordPress, WeberTube, YouTube, TeacherTube, and even the Video Portal if we want, and display them all seamlessly in MyWeber, so the user never has to question where they come from.
  • When a user hovers over the name of a school or event in the portal, a Google Map could instantly pop up, and the map could give them the location. We could even let them enter their street address, and keep a list of addresses on file for the user, so they can receive directions to the school/event from wherever they are.
  • A teacher could have some photos on Flickr they want to share with their students in Moodle as part of a lesson plan. Rather than force them to manually download each photo, a Flickr mashup could connect to their account, let them select a group of photos, and automatically transfer them to Moodle, their blog, a whiteboard (mentioned below), or any other web-based service.

AJAX LIBRARY
Ideally, the user should never have to reload the page, except when they first log in. This can be accomplished through a combination of Ajax and modal windows. The recommended way to develop an Ajax application is to use an existing Ajax library, since otherwise there’s a host of issues to worry about with getting Ajax to function properly. I’m planning on using ICEfaces or Oracle’s ADF Faces since they provide all the basic functionality that I think we’ll need to accomplish this, plus they shift the load more to the server than the clients. LightWindow may be useful for popups such as progress reports, user details, transcripts, and so on, although ADF Faces has modal window support already built-in.
SOCIAL NETWORKS
There is one major feature we’re missing, and that’s social networking. Users have to come to expect a social networking application in the new generation of web applications. When they can shape the web sites, they have a more enjoyable experience. This means they will keep returning, and recommend the site to others. A social network can be anything from seeing a simple list of other people who are logged in, to having full-fledged forums where you can directly interact and, more importantly, collaborate with others on various projects. It also includes being able to participate in surveys, leave comments on songs or videos another user has uploaded, and anything which contributes to a shared user experience.
I don’t know if there’s an easy solution for us. We’ve addressed the issue of giving students, parents, and teachers access to a social network in varying forms before, and security concerns always seem to come up. Perhaps when employees use the forums, they could opt to be a volunteer moderator, or maybe we could put each student on a probation period once they sign up (e.g., all their posts are moderated for one month and at least 20 posts) while we make sure they aren’t using the system inappropriately. We could also require parental consent before a student can use any communication system. In other words, the parent would have to first activate an account, and then be given access to logs of their students’ correspondence.
We could have forums for users to interact with other users. Different types of groups could be set up, e.g. a teacher-students group, an administrator-administrator group, a teacher-tech group, a tech-parents group, and so on. We could convert a forum backend to a real-time RSS-based chat-style display, for simplified viewing in the portal.
Another route would be a selective user-based system. Let users talk to a select group of other users in the simplest form possible. Since this format is basically an instant messenger with a buddy list, we could set up a Jabber server for all the portal users, including parents, and develop a web-based interface. Employees could talk to their co-workers, teachers could host online parent-teacher conferences, department heads could hold online Q&A sessions, and students could talk to their friends. And none of the data need be viewable to those who aren’t allowed to see it, all of it would be logged, and anyone could set up their own unique group of portal users to communicate with.
Users could also use their cell phones to send text messages to the portal in this way, to contribute to a group discussion. We might want to also consider integrating other social networks into our interface, such as Yahoo! for Teachers using Google’s OpenSocial.
Whatever the answer may be, and if it’s not overly idealistic, creating a social network for all our users will be one of the best assets of the district.
COLLABORATION
It would be invaluable to give our staff and students access to a portal-based teaming and conferencing system, particularly something with a collaborative whiteboard and a document sharing system (e.g. Hiveboard). A couple provisions are in order:

  1. Others would need to be able to see exactly who’s editing the whiteboard, and
  2. A moderator (such as a teacher) would need to be able to prohibit access to specified users. All correspondence and collaboration should be savable and exportable to some simple form, too.

There may even be a way to tie in the online whiteboard with Smartboards, so combined with our audio streaming server, students at home can follow the lesson along with the in-class students.
BLOGS
Integrating a social network into a site is one of the best ways to get people to use the site, and our blogs are a good step toward this. The next step is to provide a blog aggregator. The portal should include a widget which aggregates all the blog RSS feeds relevant to the user by default, such as all blog feeds for a student’s teachers, or the technology blog for employees, and lets the user add any other blogs to the aggregator they want.
Our blogs should also have some easy statistical information associated with them, a simplistic version of MeasureMap, if you will. This way users can see right off how popular they are, and with any luck employees will be encouraged to use them more frequently.
Since users don’t always want to just go hunting through the content, a great way to bring all these together is to let users search through the blogs (Technorati is a good example of a blog search tool), as well as their Moodle courses, events, and so on.
CALENDAR
Every school regularly puts their events into the Groupwise calendar, and many departments do as well. There’s no reason not to include a calendar on the portal, and to provide each user a customized view of events relevant to them. A student should be able to see when the next holiday is, when the next football game is, what’s happening at the next assembly, and employees should be able to see when department meetings are being held, and so on. The calendar could also be merged with users’ birthdays for optional display, or perhaps each user could set up a list of friends and share information across calendars. What a user is able to see on the calendar should be customizable, and they should be able to import any public events they want into Groupwise, or another iCal-based scheduling system.
INTEGRATED DOCUMENT STORAGE
There should be a central filesystem for storing all staff (and possibly student) files. We have this already with the wwwstaff volume we’ve set up for the portal, but right now uploaded content for WordPress, Moodle, etc. stays on their own fileservers. The solution may be as simple as creating soft-links and mounts from our other web sites to wwwstaff, but more likely would involve some crafty filesystem manipulation and some way of identifying the type of information. An even simpler solution may be to have a process that goes out and identifies all the pertinent files on our web servers, then stores necessary linking data in XML or a database.
The benefit of doing this would be that ALL our documents would be indexable and searchable.
MOBILE DEVICES
Creating a mobile version of the portal is becoming increasingly necessary. While the portal is currently viewable on PocketPCs, it is not at the point I’d like it to be just yet, and it can be much, much better. The rate of growth of mobile web users is outpacing that of standard web users. More 16 year-olds now want an iPhone rather than a car. The next generation of phones will take their cue from the iPhone (Google Android has already started down this path) and future phones will provide full browser and full Ajax capability. I don’t think it’s necessary to focus on the iPhone just yet, but this focus should be reevaluated in a year.
We should concentrate on the older smart phones and PDAs and concurrently develop a version of the portal best suited to them. With some good development practices in place, it will be easy to make a mobile version of MyWeber v8 alongside the regular portal. We can include features like leaving text messages to a web service on the portal (such as a teacher’s blog, or on WeberTube, through an SMS message.
There are many possibilities involved in “mobilizing” the portal. A few examples follow:

  • Many of our teachers give a simple assignment to “Leave a comment on my blog.” Rather than require students to log into a computer, they could simply send a text message to the teacher’s blog, and the comment would be posted. Enabling text message input could be extended to other services, too, such as a portal-based conferencing utility or social network.
  • Students and employees could use the teaming and conferencing system directly from their phone or PDA.
  • Teachers could send a reminder to students that a homework assignment is due. A student could set up their phone to receive notices like this.
  • WordPress has a plugin that lets you support multiple template types, which would let any of our employees enable their blogs for mobile devices.

What's the Next "Big Thing" at WSD?

2

Every year for the past few years we’ve been introducing something “new” and “big” in the Weber School District. 2006 was the year of our shiny new portal, MyWeber. In 2007, the teacher blogs were the huge hit when we introduced them at our first BrainBlast conference — which itself was another “big thing.” For 2008, I believe it will be WSD Online, our system for creating online courses, and WeberTube, our new media sharing portal.
WSD OnlineWSD Online, which is based on Moodle, will be a huge hit because it’s so convenient for teachers to create an online quiz to have their students take tests, or create a forum to facilitate a group discussion, or provide a space to let students upload their homework assignments. WSD Online can very well be the solution for paperless classrooms. What teacher wouldn’t love that? However, I do think its acceptance and gradual usage will be a little slow due to its learning curve.
This year we also launched WeberTube, our media sharing portal for the employees. I foresee it becoming an extremely valuable service to our teachers, as media can be easily uploaded and then streamed right to the classroom. WeberTube kind of happened by accident, when I stumbled upon the open source PHPmotion media sharing script. I instantly saw the possibilities for such a service in the district, and though I ended up choosing osTube as the script for WeberTube, its presence in the district makes sense. My philosophy is that when we block access to a web site that is useful for educational purposes, however good our intentions are, we have an obligation to provide an alternative. Since we are blocking YouTube, which has plenty of “good” stuff mixed in with the “bad,” we should provide something to fill that void. WeberTube is our answer. In some ways it’s actually better than YouTube, since it allows audio, pictures, and documents in addition to video. Users can rate and leave comments on media, and groups can be created to better organize the content. The interface needs some cleaning up before it can become as smooth an experience as it should be, and there’s constant ongoing development with it, but overall it’s an excellent resource.
This evening I was listening to episode 13 of the Shifting Our Schools podcast. A topic about change vs. transition came up which I thought was especially good. Change is easy. For instance, we can introduce blogs into our district with very little effort. All we have to do is allocate some server space, bandwidth, and install WordPress MU with an LDAP plugin. Voila! We’ve created change, and now all teachers have blogs. The harder part is transition. How do you get everyone to actually use the blogs? How do you address the people who resist the change? How do you make sure they know how to use the new services? People need to be allowed some time to learn the new technology, adapt to the changes, and even grieve the loss of their old methods. This is the transitioning period.
I believe we are doing the right things to help our users transition. BrainBlast has been a key player. Teachers can come and learn about cool new technologies we’re offering and be given a push to making the transition. Yet you can’t push a teacher through that door — they have to walk through themselves. Cliche but true. This is why it’s important to identify the key technical teachers, the ones who are willing to shift to new methods, new ideas, and embrace the changes we are making in our instructional technology. They can be the ones who help us guide the other teachers through the transition.
E-volve, which we introduced this year, will help the transition as well. Administrators can sign up their staff and faculty for specialized training sessions, headed by an elite team of school techs: Justin McFarland, Casey Dalpias, Jeff Pfister, and Trent Bills. Each tech will organize their schedule and train small groups of employees on the technology available to them.
So what’s the next big change for Weber School District? What will be the next “big thing” for 2009? There are a couple things I would like to see. One is increased podcasting. Another is social networks.
I am hoping to see more and more podcasting projects as we go on. Jennifer Boyer-Thurgood, for example, has been an advocate of podcasting for quite awhile, and uses them with her third grade class. She has found they increase reading and fluency in students, and foster self-direction and self-reflection. Moreover, class podcasting is a fun project, with generally positive parent support.
ooVooI’d like to see more podcasting projects that involve “roundtable discussions,” where two or more employees or students talk about a topic. I’d like to see more live streamed podcasts, where the podcasters set up a schedule of when they’ll do the podcast, and use ooVoo or Skype to converse. Then EdCast could stream the podcast to a Shoutcast or Icecast server and relay it over the web, while simultaneously archiving it for later playback. Imagine how amazing it would be if groups of school administrators got together and held monthly podcasts to talk about the directions they wanted to take their schools, or if department heads podcasted about their goals for the year, or even if board meetings were all live-streamed and podcasted.
WeberTube may very well become the center for podcast activity. We could add the ability to organize audio into podcasts, and add subscription services and RSS feeds. I would also like to see Weber School District generating enough content to warrant a presence on the new iTunes K-12, which just launched in July.
As for social networking, this is something we typically block in our school districts (and as with media sharing, when we block something useful I believe we have an obligation to provide an alternative). Often, at best social networks just encourage aimless online meandering among students, idly chitchatting with their online peers when they should be working. At worst students can get mixed up with wholly inappropriate content on social networks.
According to the 2008 Horizon Report, the adoption of social networks in education is imminent. It’s not something we can sweep under the rug anymore. But we need to stray from our preconceptions of social networks for a minute, and figure out what our goals are. How can we create better learners with a social network?
Actually, I don’t even like the term “social network” because it doesn’t convey what we’re trying to accomplish. “Social” implies little or no direction, as if we’re just using it to chat with our friends or upload personal photos. This is why I prefer the term learning network. A learning network has clear goals in mind: engaging the students in a way that’s familiar to them and creating learning opportunities for them around every corner.
Here’s an example of how a learning network could be useful. In social studies, a teacher wants to teach her 6th grade class about Japanese culture. Instead of simply making the students read from a dusty old textbook or showing a boring video from the 1970s, she contacts a teacher from Japan, and sets up a learning network for the classes. Armed with parental waivers 🙂 , these two classrooms then engage each other, and collaborate on a joint project together. They are given the assignment to work in groups of two — one American student and one Japanese student — and take photos of simple objects from their respective hometowns, such as: mailbox, car, mall, clothing, girl, boy, school, bus, house, restaurant, etc., then create an Animoto video showcasing the objects. The videos are then embedded on a forum, and the learning network becomes the central point of activity for this collaborative project. The project could then be further extended to where the two students on opposite sides of the ocean interview each other and create a media-rich PowerPoint presentation about their partner, which they then present to their class.
How much more exciting is this learning opportunity for a young student than learning the traditional textbook-in-hand way? The students shift from the simple role of student to collaborator, explorer, and teacher. What other projects can you think of that could benefit from a learning network?

Go to Top