The Case for Ed Tech
“I can’t believe you let students access the Internet without even  talking to us parents about it. I don’t see why they need to be online.  We didn’t have these things when we were in school and we got a good  education. Kids are just wasting their time online on websites like  Myspace and schools are doing nothing about it. How about you use the  taxpayer money you waste on expensive computers to fix up the schools or  pay the teachers more?”
This is just one of many messages  that I’ve received from parents who are upset about the fact that our  schools use technology. With a career in educational technology and  having tinkered with computers since the age of seven, I sometimes find  these statements foreign and quite confusing. It’s not uncommon to find  parents who think schools are wasting their time buying new computers,  and many of them have never even heard of an interactive whiteboard or a  document camera. However, it’s a perfectly valid concern. They have  good intentions. They believe education should come first, but it may  not be readily apparent just how technology improves the quality of  education. If we as educators are making decisions to adopt additional  technology, the justification for its use rests on our shoulders.  Fortunately, there is a wide body of evidence that demonstrates the  powerful and beneficial impact technology can have on an educational  environment.
What  is Educational Technology?
 So there’s no ambiguity, let’s  define exactly what is meant by “educational technology.” According to  the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), it  is “the study and ethical practice of facilitating learning and  improving performance by creating, using, and managing appropriate  technological processes and resources” (Januszewski & Molenda, 2008,  p. 2). What this means in a nutshell is that educational technology  exists specifically to help students become better learners. If it does  not help them in this capacity, it is not an appropriate technology.
So there’s no ambiguity, let’s  define exactly what is meant by “educational technology.” According to  the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT), it  is “the study and ethical practice of facilitating learning and  improving performance by creating, using, and managing appropriate  technological processes and resources” (Januszewski & Molenda, 2008,  p. 2). What this means in a nutshell is that educational technology  exists specifically to help students become better learners. If it does  not help them in this capacity, it is not an appropriate technology.
Insisting  we shouldn’t be using technology in a school is like saying we  shouldn’t be driving cars because we have perfectly good horses. There  are things a car can do that a horse can’t, such as travel 80 miles per  hour and get people to their destinations faster. On the other hand, a  horse can travel on rugged terrain most cars can’t reach.
Perhaps  it’s ironic that the parent who sent the complaint did so through  email. Why was email used instead of the traditional postal service?  Because modern technology advances allow near-instantaneous  communication across the world, and since my email address was readily  available to this parent, it was the obvious choice. It was the best  tool for the job, just like depending on the situation, a car or horse  may be the best means of transportation.
A proper study of  educational technology identifies the best tools that will create  optimal learning experiences for students, or benefit teachers in some  way that helps them communicate their instruction more efficiently and  effectively. One important fact should be kept in mind: Technology is  not a replacement for a teacher. There is no time in the foreseeable  future when a teacher’s job will be made obsolete. Instead, when placed  in the hands of a good teacher, technology can improve teaching skills  and cultivate an improvement in students’ learning.
Technology Transforms the K-12 School System
 Most of our students are  already immersed in a technological world. They’re skilled users who  have grown up with technology in their daily lives. They’re users of  cell phones, iPods, video games, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and many  other technology tools. Prensky (2001) refers to these children as  “digital natives,” young people who are adept users of technology and  have always been surrounded by it. They are familiar and competent with  the digital tools, and embrace new technologies as they appear.  Contrasted with “digital natives” are the “digital immigrants,” the  older generation who recall a time when modern technology tools did not  exist, and who often have an awkward time adopting them. Students today  have different expectations of technological engagement than students  used to, and they may expect the same level of engagement in their  schools.
Most of our students are  already immersed in a technological world. They’re skilled users who  have grown up with technology in their daily lives. They’re users of  cell phones, iPods, video games, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, and many  other technology tools. Prensky (2001) refers to these children as  “digital natives,” young people who are adept users of technology and  have always been surrounded by it. They are familiar and competent with  the digital tools, and embrace new technologies as they appear.  Contrasted with “digital natives” are the “digital immigrants,” the  older generation who recall a time when modern technology tools did not  exist, and who often have an awkward time adopting them. Students today  have different expectations of technological engagement than students  used to, and they may expect the same level of engagement in their  schools.
Fortunately, there is a wide spectrum of technology tools that can benefit learning in a K-12 environment. For example,  teachers can use podcasting to improve their students’ reading,  literacy, and language skills, and use auditory playback to identify  where they need additional instructional assistance. Podcasting can also  be used to share lectures that students may have missed (Hew, 2009).  Document cameras and digital projectors allow teachers to display  papers, photographs, books, and lab specimens on a big screen (Doe,  2008). Google Earth allows students to instantly explore the world,  locate famous landmarks, and watch embedded instructional videos. Blogs  allow both students and parents to instantly communicate with the  teachers, and provide a window into the classroom. When used by  students, they can increase literacy skills and promote global  citizenship (Witte, 2007). Augmented reality devices project images over  real-life objects, creating visual, highly-engaging activities  (Dunleavy, Dede, & Mitchell, 2007). Even the video games students  like to play online have educational promise because “they immerse  students in complex communities of practice” and “invite extended  engagement with course material” (Delwiche, 2006). Our youngest learners  can benefit from technology, too, as one study showed that preschoolers  who were introduced to video and educational games experienced marked  improvement in literacy and conceptualizing skills over students who did  not have access to these technology tools (Penuel, Pasnik, Bates,  Townsend, Gallagher, Llorente, & Hupert, 2009).
Students with  disabilities also benefit from using technology tools. Rhodes &  Milby (2007) found that students with disabilities are often proficient  with using technology to accomplish learning tasks and interactive  activities they wouldn’t otherwise be able to do. Electronic books, with  their text-to-speech capabilities, animation, and interactivity can  boost their confidence, and encourage fluency, comprehension, and  language skills.
Technology is more than just a gimmick. It can  improve the cognitive learning abilities of students, and support and  enhance their learning capabilities (Krentler & Willis-Flurry,  2007). Even students who generally struggle with learning or have  disciplinary problems show improvement when technology is used  (Dunleavy, et al., 2007). Technology can stimulate children’s cognitive  development by improving logical thinking, classification, and concept  visualization skills, and creating intellectually stimulating hands-on  learning activities. Skills such as literacy, mathematics, and writing  are improved and reinforced by a technology-oriented education (Mouza,  2005). Students who recognize technology’s educational benefits are more  likely to become engaged in the learning process, seek out their own  learning opportunities, maintain a stronger focus on accomplishing their  learning tasks, and improve their higher-order thinking skills that  allow them to become better problem-solvers (Hopson, Simms, &  Knezek, 2001).
One benefit of the Internet is that students have  an easy way to share their hard work with a wide audience. Students gain  confidence and pride when they see their products in a visual form. The  online social aspect can also reduce feelings of isolation, and  encourage discussions and peer instruction (Mouza, 2005). One researcher  commented, “Youth could benefit from educators being more open to forms  of experimentation and social exploration that are generally not  characteristic of educational institutions” (Ito, Horst, Bittanti, Boyd,  Herr-Stephenson, & Lange, 2009). So important is technology to a  K-12 school environment that the National Association for the Education  of Young Children states that technology should be used as an active  part of the learning process (Rhodes & Milby, 2007).
Technology Enhances Professional Development
 Professional development  refers to any skills or knowledge obtained that benefits one in their  career. We are experiencing an unusual phenomenon in our school systems.  For once, most of our students possess a greater knowledge and skill in  a field than many teachers do. It’s important that teachers engage in  professional development opportunities so they can “keep up” with the  students’ extensive experience with technology.
Professional development  refers to any skills or knowledge obtained that benefits one in their  career. We are experiencing an unusual phenomenon in our school systems.  For once, most of our students possess a greater knowledge and skill in  a field than many teachers do. It’s important that teachers engage in  professional development opportunities so they can “keep up” with the  students’ extensive experience with technology.
Not long ago, the  extent of a teacher’s learning didn’t stretch beyond the walls of the  school. Teachers would gather in the teachers’ lounge to discuss their  instructional strategies. One way to motivate teachers and provide  ongoing work-related educational support is through online communities,  where peers support each others’ learning. Hausman and Goldring (2001)  found that teachers are most committed to their schools when they have a  sense of community, and are offered opportunities to learn.
In an online community, a teacher can post a question and receive back  insightful answers with minimal effort on their part. Teachers can also  share their experiences, and gather evidence of the success of new  techniques (Duncan-Howell, 2010). Online courses are prevalent, podcasts  are available to extend learning, professional-oriented chat rooms  spring up, educators share their thoughts on their blogs, and teachers  set up and share webcam feeds at conferences so other members of the  online community can learn the new techniques and skills necessary for  teaching modern students. Technology has allowed teachers to  figuratively break through the walls of their schools and engage a vast  community of like-minded individuals who come together to interact,  learn, and share knowledge with each other.
Technology is  Necessary in the Outside World
 One of the expectations of our  education system is that students will be taught the skills necessary  to be productive and competitive members of society and the modern  workplace. As Harris (1996) pointed out, “Information Age citizens must  learn not only how to access information, but more importantly how to  manage, analyze, critique, cross-reference, and transform it into usable  knowledge” (p. 15). Businesses are rapidly adopting new technologies to  simplify and enhance their processes, and are demanding higher-order  critical thinking skills of their job candidates. Adults who use the  Internet have greater success at obtaining jobs, and have higher  salaries (DiMaggio,  Hargittai, Celeste, & Shafer, 2004), and technology prepares students for the  modern-day jobs they will obtain by teaching them skills such as  motivation, engagement, and online collaboration (Ringstaff &  Kelley, 2002). If students are not taught the necessary skills they need  during their K-12 education, they will be at a severe disadvantage when  they are ready to enter the workforce.
One of the expectations of our  education system is that students will be taught the skills necessary  to be productive and competitive members of society and the modern  workplace. As Harris (1996) pointed out, “Information Age citizens must  learn not only how to access information, but more importantly how to  manage, analyze, critique, cross-reference, and transform it into usable  knowledge” (p. 15). Businesses are rapidly adopting new technologies to  simplify and enhance their processes, and are demanding higher-order  critical thinking skills of their job candidates. Adults who use the  Internet have greater success at obtaining jobs, and have higher  salaries (DiMaggio,  Hargittai, Celeste, & Shafer, 2004), and technology prepares students for the  modern-day jobs they will obtain by teaching them skills such as  motivation, engagement, and online collaboration (Ringstaff &  Kelley, 2002). If students are not taught the necessary skills they need  during their K-12 education, they will be at a severe disadvantage when  they are ready to enter the workforce.
Face-to-face  communication skills are and likely always will be important in the  workplace, but social business skills have expanded to include more than  just face-to-face communication. Teleconferencing, collaborative  document authoring, online correspondence, video conferencing, and more  are common in modern workplaces. While parents think their children are  wasting their time talking to others online, our youth are acquiring  basic social and technological skills they need to fully participate in  contemporary society (Ito, et al., 2009). If we restrict our children  from using these online social forms of learning, we are stifling their  future careers, and preventing them from being able to compete in this  digital age.
Conclusion
In the parent’s message  at the beginning of this paper there was one fundamental misconception: that technology and learning are at odds with each other. This is  simply not the case, and the research paints a very different picture. We are experiencing a “shrinking  world” as technology has opened lines of communication that just  20 years ago were either impossible or a monumentally expensive feat.  Students should realize the educational potential of technology, and we  must be prepared to create learning opportunities that encourage them to  use technology in their education. Ultimately, if we wish to create  motivated, lifelong learners with the necessary knowledge and skills  that give them a competitive advantage in modern careers, we must  embrace technology in our schools.
References
Delwiche,  A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media  classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 160-172.
DiMaggio,  P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal  access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for  research on digital inequality. Social inequality, 355–400.
Doe, C.  (2008). A look at document cameras. MultiMedia & Internet@Schools, 15(5), 30-33.
Duncan-Howell, J. (2010). Teachers  making connections: Online communities as a source of professional  learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2),  324-340. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00953.x
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell,  R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory  augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of  Science Education & Technology, 18(1), 7-22. doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
Harris, J. (1996).  Information is forever in formation, knowledge is the knower: Global  connectivity in K-12 classrooms.  Computers in the Schools, 72(1-2),  11-22.
Hausman, C. S., &  Goldring, E. B. (2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of  professional communities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2),  30-51.
Hew, K. (2009). Use of audio podcast in K-12 and  higher education: A review of research topics and methodologies. Educational  Technology Research & Development, 57(3), 333-357. doi:10.1007/s11423-008-9108-3
Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., &  Knezek, G. A. (2001). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve  higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in  Education, 34(2), 109-120.
Januszewski, A., &  Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with  commentary. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc.
Ito, M.,  Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., & Lange, P.  G. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from  the digital youth project. Retrieved May 4, 2010, from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf.
Krentler, K. A. & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does  technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online  discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316-321. doi:10.3200/JOEB.80.6.316-321
Mouza, C. (2005).  Using technology to enhance early childhood learning: The 100 days of  school project. Educational Research & Evaluation, 11(6),  513-528.
Penuel, W. R., Pasnik, S.,  Bates, L., Townsend, E., Gallagher, L. P., Llorente, C., & Hupert,  N. (2009). Preschool teachers can use a media-rich curriculum to prepare  low-income children for school success: Results of a randomized  controlled trial. Summative evaluation of the “Ready to learn  initiative”. Education Development Center. Retrieved May 4, 2010 from http://cct.edc.org/rtl/pdf/RTLEvalReport.pdf.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital  immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved May 4, 2010,  from http://www.hfmboces.org/HFMDistrictServices/TechYES/PrenskyDigitalNatives.pdf
Rhodes, J., & Milby, T. (2007).  Teacher-created electronic books: Integrating technology to support  readers with disabilities. Reading Teacher, 61(3), 255-259.
Ringstaff,  C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our education  technology investment: A review of findings from  research. San  Francisco: WestEd. Retrieved May 4, 2010, from https://www.msu.edu/~corleywi/documents/Positive_impact_tech/The%20learning%20return%20on%20our%20educational%20technology%20investment.pdf
Witte,  S. (2007). “That’s online writing, not boring school writing”: Writing  with blogs and the talkback project. Journal of Adolescent &  Adult Literacy, 51(2), 92-96.

Leave a Reply